The decision aid could help ER patients and doctors work together to make the best decision for each patient. Hospitals can use a decision aid like the one in this study with ER patients who have chest pain but no heart attack diagnosis. The research team didn’t design the decision aid for patients at risk for heart problems who come to the ER because of other symptoms. The study included only patients who had chest pain. Forty-five days after patients left the ER, the research team asked them about the cardiac tests they had after their ER visit and whether they had a heart attack or other major heart problem since their ER visit. The research team also made visual and audio recordings of more than half of the patients when they talked with their ER doctors. ER doctors talked to these patients the way they usually talk to patients not in the study.Īll patients took a survey at the end of their ER visits. Patients in the second group didn’t get a decision aid. ER doctors used the decision aid to talk to patients about their options for heart testing and make a decision with them. Patients in the first group got the decision aid with their personal risk information included. Then, the research team assigned patients by chance to one of two groups. What did the research team do?ĭoctors in the ER first confirmed that the patients had not had heart attacks and didn’t have a history of heart disease. About 60 percent of patients were female. About 60 percent of patients were white and 34 percent were black. Patients in the study had gone to the ER for chest pain, but based on test results, had not had a heart attack. The study included 898 patients at six hospitals in the United States. No patients in the study died because of a heart attack or other severe heart problems. Were less likely to decide to get more heart tests during the ER visit.Were less likely to decide with their doctors to stay in the ER.Were more involved in making decisions in the ER.Had more knowledge about their risk of heart attack.What were the results?Ĭompared with patients who didn’t use the decision aid, patients who used the decision aid The team also looked at whether any patients had heart attacks or other severe heart problems during the 45 days after they visited the ER. The research team wanted to see if the decision aid changed patients’ knowledge about their risk for having a heart attack in the near future, patients’ involvement in the decision about further heart testing, and the decisions they made. The aim of the talks was to help patients and ER doctors decide together about whether patients would stay in the hospital for further tests or go home and wait to decide about further tests until they had an outpatient appointment with their doctor. The patients talked with the doctors treating them in the ER about the information in the decision aid. This decision aid was a single printed page that showed patients their chest-pain diagnosis, their risk of having a heart attack in the near future, and their options for more tests. Decision aids help people choose between two or more healthcare options based on what is most important to them. The research team created a decision aid that gave patients information on their personal risk of having a heart attack. Patients at low risk for having a heart attack in the near future may not need these tests. Even though the number of people having heart attacks has gone down in recent years, the number of people getting heart-imaging tests during ER visits after a doctor has said they didn’t have a heart attack is rising. More than 8 million people go to the emergency room (ER) for chest pain every year in the United States.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |